51% Attacks in Blockchain

A 51% attack is a malicious action carried out on a blockchain network by an individual or group controlling more than 50% of the total computing power (hash rate) or stake in the network. This attack can occur in both Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus algorithms, but the specifics and implications differ for each.

51% Attack in Proof of Work (PoW): In PoW-based blockchains, such as Bitcoin, miners compete to solve complex mathematical puzzles to add new blocks to the blockchain. The one who finds the correct solution first gets to add the block and is rewarded with new coins (block reward) and transaction fees. The probability of finding the solution is directly related to the miner's hash rate, which is the computational power they contribute to the network.

A 51% attack in PoW occurs when a single entity or a group gains control of more than 50% of the total network's hash rate. With such control, the attacker can execute several malicious actions, such as:

a. Double Spending: The attacker can spend their cryptocurrency coins on the network, create an alternative private blockchain, and then release that blockchain to the public. Since the attacker controls the majority of the network's hash rate, their chain will grow faster than the honest chain, leading to a longer valid blockchain. This enables them to "double-spend" the same coins, once on the original chain and again on their private chain.

b. Preventing Transactions: The attacker can selectively include or exclude transactions from blocks, effectively censoring certain transactions or users from participating in the network.

c. Reversing Transactions: The attacker can mine a new, longer blockchain that invalidates specific transactions or blocks, including transactions they previously confirmed. This is particularly impactful when used to reverse large transactions or payments, causing confusion and undermining the integrity of the blockchain.

51% Attack in Proof of Stake (PoS): In PoS-based blockchains, validators are chosen to create new blocks and validate transactions based on the amount of cryptocurrency they "stake" or lock in the network. The more coins a validator stakes, the higher the chances of being selected to forge the next block and earn transaction fees.

A 51% attack in PoS occurs when an entity or a group gains control of more than 50% of the total cryptocurrency supply or the network's validator slots. With such control, the attacker can execute several malicious actions, such as:

a. Block Withholding: The attacker can deliberately choose not to validate specific transactions or create new blocks, leading to network congestion and preventing certain transactions from being processed.

b. Deterministic Forging: If the PoS protocol uses a deterministic selection process based on the coin's age or other factors, an attacker with majority control can manipulate the selection process to increase their chances of being chosen as the next validator consistently.

Let's take an example

Imagine a blockchain network as a big digital playground where everyone plays fair and follows the rules.
In this playground, two main games are being played: one called "Proof of Work" (PoW) and the other called "Proof of Stake" (PoS).

In the PoW game, miners are like puzzle solvers. They compete to solve challenging math puzzles, and the first one to solve it gets a prize and becomes the leader for the next game round. The more puzzles you solve, the higher your chances of winning. But, if someone has more than half of the puzzle-solving power, they can become a bit of a bully.

Imagine one big kid joining the game with a lot of computers and becoming really fast at solving puzzles. They become so powerful that they control more than 50% of the game. Now, this big kid can use their power to do some tricky things:

1. Double Spending: They can buy a cool toy with their money and secretly buy the same toy again with their digital coins. Since they control most of the game, they can quickly create a fake version of the playground where they bought the toy twice, making everyone confused.

2. Censorship: The big kid can also pick and choose which players are allowed to play. They might not like someone, so they'll ignore their games and not let them join the fun.

3. Rewriting History: Sometimes, when we play games, we make mistakes. The big kid can use their power to change the rules and erase the mistakes, pretending they never happened. It's like going back in time and pretending the game never took place.

The same kind of thing can happen in the PoS game, but instead of puzzle-solving, the players need to show their tokens (like game tickets) to play. The more tokens you have, the more times you get to be the leader of the next game. If one player or a group has more than half of all the tokens, they become the boss of the playground.

So, in the end, it's all about everyone playing together, having fun, and making sure no one kid becomes a bully and ruins the games for everyone else. That's how these blockchain playgrounds stay secure and fun for everyone!

This blog was written under Social3 Degens Program. Social3 is a go-to place for web3 jobs, internships and opportunities! If you are looking for opportunities, find them here 👉 https://app.social3.club/jobs 🚀

Follow us on Twitter- https://twitter.com/Social3Club